What Are Your Standard Takeoff Minimums? (Part 91)

Imagine you arrive at the airport planning a quick hop to the rustic mountainside cabin you reserved for a weekend getaway. The only problem? The runway is socked in with fog as thick as pea soup, and it doesn’t look like it will be dissipating any time soon. Now what?

If you are flying under Part 91 and are instrument rated, you have the choice to fly IFR, meaning VFR visibility minimums don’t apply, but what about IFR takeoff minimums? Can you meet standard takeoff minimums for Part 91 IFR flight?

Standard Takeoff Minimums Infographic - Pilot Mall

Standard Takeoff Minimums

Pilots must meet the FAA’s established standard visibility takeoff minimums for the part they are flying under. Minimums vary by part and by the number of aircraft engines. More engines equate to lower takeoff minimums since the aircraft has an improved ability to power itself out of dangerous situations, and if one engine stalls, the aircraft is not completely without power.

Part 91 Minimums

Unless a pilot has been assigned and accepted a Standard Instrument Departure (SID), the following applies:

  • No visibility or ceiling takeoff minimums

Asking about Part 91 standard takeoff minimums is somewhat of a trick question since unless you accepted a Standard Instrument Departure, as an IFR pilot flying under Part 91, you not bound to any official FAA standard takeoff minimums. In fact, a Part 91 pilot flying under instrument flight rules could legally opt for a “zero-zero” takeoff into conditions with no visibility or ceiling.

Such a take-off would be legal, but would it be prudent? This brings up the ongoing legal vs safe debate and the saying that “just because you can doesn’t mean you should.” While Part 91 pilots have no official standard takeoff minimums, that does not mean that we should just file an IFR flight plan and take off regardless.

Pilots flying under other parts do have standard takeoff minimums, and for good reason. Learning more about these other minimums can help Part 91 pilots to create and commit to our own personal takeoff minimums.

Takeoff Minimums Infographic - Pilot Mall

Part 121, Part 125, Part 129, and Part 135 Minimums

Unless operating specifications state otherwise, the following engine-based minimums apply for aircraft operating under FAR parts 121, 125, 129, and 135:

  • One or two engines: one statute mile of visibility; no ceiling minimum
  • Three or more engines: one-half statute mile of visibility; no ceiling minimum
  • Helicopters: one-half statute mile of visibility; no ceiling minimum

Lower than Standard Takeoff Minimums

Pilots flying under Part 121 and/or Part 135 may be eligible to use lower than standard takeoff minimums (LSTOM). These lower minimums are negotiated and agreed upon between the airline and the FAA. The agreement is based on pilots having appropriate equipment and adequate training to safely operate under the lower minimums.

If lower than standard takeoff minimums have been authorized, the authorization will be included in the Operations Specifications (OpSpec) under C079 for Part 135 or C078 for Part 121. Without this official authorization, pilots must adhere to standard minimums.

Lower than standard takeoff minimums are based on the runway visual range (RVR) system rather than statute miles (SM) of visibility as is the case with standard minimums, although feet of RVR can be converted into statute miles of visibility.

There are several groups of lower than standard minimums depending on the current RVR at the time of takeoff. The lower minimums also include lighting and runway requirements contingent upon RVR values. Consult the Airport Flight Directory to determine what lighting systems your airport has in place.

Understanding RVR Reported on a METAR

RVR above 1600 feet

  • 1 RVR report required, and touchdown zone (TDZ) report is controlling, though MID can be used if TDZ is not available
  • Visibility can be substituted for RVR
  • Must have at least 1 of the following: High-Intensity Runway Lights (HIRL), operative runway centerline (CL) lights, and/or serviceable runway centerline marking (RCLM)

RVR below 1600 feet

  • 2 RVR reports required, and all three are controlling
  • RVR reports required – no visibility substitution
  • Meet lighting and runway requirements as applicable for 1200, 1000, or 600 RVR

RVR Conversion Table - Pilot Mall

4 additional criteria for lower than standard takeoff operations

  • Must establish a takeoff alternate within a one-hour radius assuming still air conditions
  • No single pilot operations if carrying passengers – single pilot allowed for cargo-only flights
  • Pilot in Command (PIC) must have at least 100 hours of flight time in the make and model of aircraft being flown under LSTOM conditions. The same applies to the second in command (SIC) if manipulating the controls during takeoff
  • If aircraft is equipped with a heads-up display (HUD), meet additional HUD requirements

The rules surrounding lower than standard minimums can quickly get confusing, so pilots are advised to carry a cheat sheet for reference.

Want to quickly check Takeoff Minimums online?

If you want to check out approach plates and read takeoff minimums to get a better understanding of how they work, you can view them on Skyvector.

How to Find Takeoff Minimums on Skyvector - Pilot Mall

Personal Takeoff Minimums

The standard published takeoff minimums for other parts are a starting point for establishing the personal minimums that we can and should commit to as Part 91 pilots. Some airfields also have alternate takeoff minimums that Part 91 pilots are encouraged to abide by.

Minimum needs can vary by location due to unique runway configurations and surrounding terrain features. When deciding on personal minimums for a new airfield, the field’s published approach minimums are another good reference point.

Adopting the approach minimums as our personal minimums for takeoff sets us up for a safe return to the runway should we need to abort our takeoff.

Understanding Takeoff Minimums Infographic - Pilot Mall

Remember, pilots flying under FAR Part 91 do not have any official takeoff minimums they must adhere to. Still, it is prudent to review the regulations for other parts and to establish personal takeoff minimums in advance with a focus on safety. 

Training

2 comments

Noah M

Noah M

Interesting article!
My question is: Why do part 91 pilots not have takeoff minimums?

JohnB

JohnB

Part 91 states that there are no Standard TakeOff minimums for pilots unless that pilot is given a clearance for a published departure and accepts it! Since we do not have to comply with Standard Take Off minimums, what about Charted Take Off minimums? The T published on the Sid?

Leave a comment

All comments are moderated before being published

Latest Blog Posts

View all
Garmin GDL 50 vs GDL 52: Portable ADS-B Receivers Compared (2025 Buyer’s Guide)

Garmin GDL 50 vs GDL 52: Portable ADS-B Receivers Compared (2025 Buyer’s Guide)

ADS-B

Choosing between Garmin's popular portable ADS-B receivers? Our in-depth comparison breaks down the key differences between the GDL 50 (ADS-B weather/traffic) and the GDL 52 (ADS-B + SiriusXM weather/audio). Discover which unit best fits your flying needs, budget, and desired features – from subscription-free ADS-B essentials to the comprehensive coverage and entertainment of SiriusXM. Read the full comparison to make the right choice for your cockpit.

The Coolest Gadgets for Pilots 2023

The Coolest Gadgets for Pilots: Upgrade Your Cockpit Today

Gifts

It is no secret that pilots love gadgets, especially gadgets that improve the flight experience. To make gift giving easy, we have rounded up some of the coolest gadgets currently available for pilots. Whether you want to help your favorite pilot upgrade their aircraft or improve their communication capabilities, these high-tech gadgets are sure to do the trick.

Bose A30 Aviation Headset In-Depth Review (2025): Worth the Investment?

Bose A30 Aviation Headset In-Depth Review (2025): Worth the Investment?

Headsets

Successor to the benchmark A20, the Bose A30 aviation headset promises next-level digital ANR, enhanced comfort through a lighter design, and superior clarity. Our in-depth 2025 review dives into its features, real-world pilot feedback after 100+ hours, and compares its $1,300 price tag against performance. Is this premium headset truly worth the investment for today's pilots? Find out if the advancements justify the cost.